“Students Feel More Dignified": Alternative Grading and Self-Assessment in Online Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18357/otessac.2022.2.1.63Keywords:
alternative grading, peer assessment, self assessment, ungradingAbstract
Judging, marking, and ranking students is a common practice in higher education, though the pervasive dependence upon grades to dictate a student’s success or failure has come under increased scrutiny. While “ungrading” and alternative grading practices are endorsed by progressive educators, there are few systematic, empirical studies of student responses to nontraditional grading. This study analyzed student reports of the benefits, challenges, and suggested improvements for “ungrading” using peer and self-assessment in two fourth-year undergraduate courses (N = 87). Student responses were overwhelmingly positive; notable positive effects of ungrading include increased motivation, decreased stress, and improved connection with peers. Challenges included being too self-critical and needing the guidance of a rubric for a gauge of where students stand in the course. Implications of this study include suggestions for freedom from the restriction, stress, and competition associated with grades, and the potential to move toward a postsecondary experience characterized by authenticity and intrinsic motivation.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sharon Lauricella
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to the OTESSA conference agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant OTESSA right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the conference's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in OTESSA's conference proceedings.